欢迎访问《渔业研究》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 153-159.

• 论文与报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

三种稻渔种养的化肥农药使用及效益分析

杨智景1,顾海龙1,杨会静2,冯亚明1   

  1. 1. 江苏省农业科学院泰州农科所
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-15 修回日期:2019-09-09 出版日期:2020-04-24 发布日期:2020-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 冯亚明
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省现代农业产业技术体系建设项目;江苏省渔业科技类项目

Application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides and economic benefit in three types of rice-aquatic culture

  • Received:2019-08-15 Revised:2019-09-09 Online:2020-04-24 Published:2020-04-28

摘要: 本文研究了水稻-小龙虾(Procambarus clarkii)、水稻-青虾(Macrobranchium nipponense)、水稻-甲鱼(AmydaSincnsis)三种种养模式和水稻单种模式下有机肥、化肥、农药、生物农药的使用情况和经济效益等。结果显示:稻-小龙虾种养模式使用了400 kg/667 m2有机肥、15 kg/667 m2尿素、100 mL苏云菌,收获了506.8 kg/667 m2水稻、106.7 kg/667 m2小龙虾,效益为4 468.4元/667 m2;稻-青虾种养模式使用了400 kg/667 m2有机肥、15 kg/667 m2尿素、15 kg/667 m2复合肥、100 mL短隐杆菌,收获了514.2 kg/667 m2水稻、56.4 kg/667 m2青虾,效益为3 235.3元/667 m2;稻-甲鱼种养模式使用了400 kg/667 m2有机肥、10 kg/667 m2微生物菌肥,收获了402.5 kg/667 m2水稻、52.8 kg/667 m2甲鱼,年均效益为4309.2元/667 m2。以水稻单种模式为对照,稻-小龙虾种养模式化肥施用量减少了50 kg/667 m2,减少76.9%的化肥使用量;稻-青虾种养模式化肥施用量减少了35 kg/667 m2, 减少了53.8%的化肥使用量;在水稻病害管理上,稻渔种养模式并未选择使传统农药,尽量选择微生物型生物农药,但对水稻稻纵卷叶螟、稻飞虱、纹枯病、稻曲病等常见病害均有效,且持续保护时间长达25 d以上。结果表明,稻渔种养模式有效增加了有机肥、生物农药的使用,减少了化肥农药的使用,而且水稻产量比较稳定,经济效益显著,减少对环境的污染,属于一种绿色、可持续生产模式。

关键词: 稻渔种养, 水生动物, 化肥, 农药, 经济效益, rice–aquatic culture, aquatic animal, fertilizer, pesticide, economic benefits

Abstract: Through the analysis and comparison of different rice-aquatic culture patterns, and the use of organic fertilizers, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, bio-pesticides and economic benefits were studied in the rice-aquatic (Procambarus clarkii, Macrobrachium nipponense, Amyda Sinensis) culture modes. The experimental data showed that the rice-crayfish culture which used 400 kg/667 m2 organic fertilizer, 15 kg/667 m2 urea, and 100 mL bio-pesticide of Bacillus thuringiensis harvested 506.8 kg/667 m2 rice and 106.7 kg/667 m2 crayfish, while the benefit is 4468.4 Yuan / 667 m2. The rice-shrimp culture which used 400 kg / 667 m2 organic fertilizer, 15 kg / 667 m2 urea, 15 kg / 667 m2 compound fertilizer, and 100 mL bio-pesticide of Empedobacter brevis harvested 514.2 kg/667 m2 rice and 56.4 kg/667 m2 shrimp, while the benefit was 3235.3 Yuan / 667 m2. The rice-turtle culture which used 400 kg / 667 m2 organic fertilizer, and 10 kg / 667 m2 microbial fertilizer, harvested 402.5 kg /667 m2 rice and 52.8 kg/667 m2 turtle, while the average annual benefit was 4309.2 Yuan / 667 m2. Compared with rice culture, the rice-crayfish culture reduced the application rate of chemical fertilizer by 50 kg/667 m2, which reduced the use of chemical fertilizer by 76.9%. The rice-shrimp culture decreased the application amount of chemical fertilizer by 35 kg/667 m2, which reduced the use of chemical fertilizer by 53.8%. In the management of rice diseases, the rice culture try to select microbial bio-pesticides instead of traditional pesticides. However, it is effective for common diseases such as rice leaf roller, rice planthopper, sheath blight and rice false smut, and the continuous protection time is more than 25 days. The results showed that the rice-aquatic culture effectively increased the use of organic fertilizers and bio-pesticides and reduced the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Simultaneously, the rice yield were relatively stable, the economic benefits were improved, and the pollution to the environment was reduced. In a word, it was an environmentally friendly and continuous production mode.

中图分类号: